News

Washington Examiner reporter Sarah Westwood discusses ‘gorgeous’ lack of transparency in BLM investigation

An investigative reporter for the Washington Examiner delivered a short rundown Friday with regard to unique reporting on Black Lives Matter.

Sarah Westwood, who covers politics and investigations, appeared on Fox Information to debate colleague Andrew Kerr’s digging into BLM’s “gorgeous” lack of transparency surrounding its funds and operations that charity consultants say raises main authorized and moral pink flags.

The Washington Examiner investigation, printed Thursday, famous that nobody seems to have been in cost at BLM for months, the deal with it lists on tax varieties is flawed, and the charity’s two board members will not say who controls its $60 million bankroll.

ANGER OVER BLM’S PURCHASE OF $8.1 MILLION TORONTO MANSION GROWS AS GROUP’S FINANCES SCRUTINIZED

“When Patrisse Cullors resigned final spring, she mentioned two activists have been going to be taking up for her in an appearing capability. Andrew reached out to them, and each of them mentioned they by no means took the job on the BLM nonprofit and had no thought if anybody ever did. The 2 remaining board members, the identified ones at BLM, wouldn’t say who’s in cost,” Westwood informed host Jesse Watters.

“The deal with that the BLM nonprofit listed on its tax varieties as the placement of its books — we despatched a reporter, Tori Richards, there to test it out,” she added. “And the safety guard there mentioned there had by no means been, at any level, a BLM workplace at that location — so [there are] a number of unanswered questions on who’s in cost and the place all that cash goes.”

Top News:  Hochul, de Blasio vow to bolster infrastructure after Ida's remnants slam New York Metropolis, killing 9

Cullors, one of many group’s co-founders who resigned in 2021, confronted backlash final 12 months after spending thousands and thousands of {dollars} on actual property. Cullors has denied spending any of the BLM cash on the purchases, however critics nonetheless attacked her lack of transparency with regard to her funds.

“It was like a smash and seize. And so they did it off the backs of individuals they have been attempting to save lots of,” Watters mentioned. “It’s actually disgraceful.”



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button